Quote:
Originally Posted by bicker
Several folks on some other forums have noted how this inquiry shows very clearly the bias that this professed journalist has already adopted: He hasn't inquired about folks who have gained channels (I gained 4) nor about folks who have neither lost nor gained anything. From what he's written, it seems that he's just trying to feed the sensationalistic trend in so-called "news" sources, seeking out foundation for whatever will sell the most magazines.
|
The reference article he posted was exactly that, but it's growing "stale" in news terms, those without CECBs. Actually the new negative story that is more real and less sensational are the people that thought they were
DTV Ready and found out post transition due to channel and power changes, they were not longer. And there are a lot more than 2.5 million of them I suppose but don't have exact data. It was the snafu the industry choose to ignore.
Less advertising throughout
