DTV USA Forum                

Go Back DTV USA Forum

Get quality HD programming with Dish Network. Your favorite shows never looked better on Satellite TV.
View Single Post
Old 07-03-2009, 11:21 AM   #10 (permalink)
Don_MUser is a DTVUSAForum Moderator
Moderator
 
Don_M's Avatar
 





Thanked 151 Times in 99 Posts
Don_M is a splendid one to beholdDon_M is a splendid one to beholdDon_M is a splendid one to beholdDon_M is a splendid one to beholdDon_M is a splendid one to beholdDon_M is a splendid one to beholdDon_M is a splendid one to beholdDon_M is a splendid one to behold
Points: 1,668, Level: 23 Points: 1,668, Level: 23 Points: 1,668, Level: 23
Activity: 20% Activity: 20% Activity: 20%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piggie View Post
This does beg an idea or though to you Don. Take a CM7777, it already has 2 switches on it. One for combined or separate and one to add or remove the FM trap filter.

I wonder if it would not be a good idea, since a switch is more reliable than a pot to add a switch to something of the gain and low noise of a CM7777 that drops the gain in half, if and only if that drop also gives an increase in the dynamic range of the amplifier.

The reason I add that last constraint is if you look at holl_and's evaluations of amps, even though the CM7778 has 10 db or so less gain than the CM7777, it apparently has no better dynamic range.
That's what I took away from his chart, too -- dynamic range doesn't necessarily have an inverse relationship to gain, so this capability must be due to something else in pre-amp design. What that might be, I can't say: I only roomed with an EE in college, I didn't major in it!

Unless you were thinking out loud here, I see little advantage to having a switch for selectable gain if it wouldn't also mean greater dynamic range. The only benefit I can imagine is that a switch might bail the buyer out in situations where a higher setting causes amp or tuner overload, but the lower setting doesn't. That's a pretty narrow circumstance that can be avoided through careful pre-amp selection.

I read a post not so long ago from a knowledgeable source asserting that a) most people who think they need an amp need a better antenna instead and b) of the few who do need a pre-amp, almost none of them need look any further than the high-input Winegard HDP-269, because its 12 dB gain was all just about any household within roughly 50 miles of the transmitters and with fewer than five TVs really needed. (He wasn't a Winegard shill, AFAIK.)

A CM 7777 makes sense in the deep fringe because its noise figure is 1 dB lower than that of the HDP-269. It's not really due to the high gain at all. That lonely little dB becomes crucial in weak-signal areas that are close to the noise floor in the first place.
View Don_M's Photo Album Don_M is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Don_M For This Useful Post:
EscapeVelocity (07-14-2009)
 
» Guest Message
» Supporters
» Marketplace: Auctions Ending Soon
» Recent Topics
Centronics ZAT 502 HD Terrestrial...
Last post by davidon
Today 11:23 AM
27 Replies, 7,646 Views
Television Winter 2009
Last post by bicker
Today 10:44 AM
9 Replies, 142 Views
converter box and antenna
Last post by lisa4172
Today 10:29 AM
0 Replies, 8 Views
Tale of Two Rotors
Last post by EscapeVelocity
Today 09:34 AM
6 Replies, 62 Views
Mobile DTV confusing and misleading...
Last post by Jay
Today 09:22 AM
4 Replies, 72 Views
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2008, 2009

DTVUSAForum.com is a fan run website and is not affiliated with ABC | CBS | FOX | HBO | NBC or any other television corporation.