07-03-2009, 05:19 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GartFarfunkel
What's the difference between these antennas? I've been shopping around and they all look the same to me.
|
In nutshell VHF are channels 2-13 and UHF are channels 14-51
However there are only a few stations still using 2-6 so there are VHF antenna that only cover 7-13 also. But all the UHF's typically do cover all of UHF, 14-51.
If you would like a an analysis of your recerption, go to TV Fool, put in your address and how high the antenna is and copy the link back here. Then we can give you a better idea of what type of antenna you need.
|
|
|
07-04-2009, 10:21 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
DTVUSA Member
|
It's all elementary, my dear GartFargunkel. Basically, the length of the element is directly prportional to the power of the frequency itself. VHF frequencies, being weaker have the best reception on larger elements, especially telescoping ones. They don't call 'em "rabbit ears" for nothing.
UHF signals are stronger, sharper, and have the best reception on small elements, the basic shape is the short bar, bowtie or loop. Some inexpensive antennas have UHF shape attachments suspended over the VHF elements.
The more elements an antenna has, the better the reception. For tough to receive signals, it's best to have separate UHF and VHF antennas, so there's no interference crossing between the two signal bands. So if you have the space to put it, build or buy a good big one.
For building your own, pant-stretchers make a great base, especially when you're planning to go on a diet. Put large VHF elements on one, and small UHF elements on the other. If you only have the target signals in the UHF band, the VHF sections may be omitted.
|
|
|
07-05-2009, 10:28 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by divxhacker
It's all elementary, my dear GartFargunkel. Basically, the length of the element is directly prportional to the power of the frequency itself. VHF frequencies, being weaker have the best reception on larger elements, especially telescoping ones. They don't call 'em "rabbit ears" for nothing.
|
The length of the element is inversely proportional to the frequency. The higher the frequency the shorter the antenna elements, having no correlation to power. VHF has the best reception on larger elements because it's wavelength is longer, taking a longer element for resonant reception, not because they are weaker.
Quote:
Originally Posted by divxhacker
UHF signals are stronger, sharper, and have the best reception on small elements, the basic shape is the short bar, bowtie or loop. Some inexpensive antennas have UHF shape attachments suspended over the VHF elements.
|
UHF is actually a weaker signal and why the stations on UHF have always run a lot more power then VHF to make up for the fact. UHF penetrates indoors which makes it appear more powerful. (Divx I don't want to totally pick this apart but trying to keep some basic RF and antenna facts straight. ) That said TV signals are for the most part sine waves and sharp doesn't apply to reception.
Quote:
Originally Posted by divxhacker
The more elements an antenna has, the better the reception. For tough to receive signals, it's best to have separate UHF and VHF antennas, so there's no interference crossing between the two signal bands. So if you have the space to put it, build or buy a good big one.
|
Exactly!
Quote:
Originally Posted by divxhacker
For building your own, pant-stretchers make a great base, especially when you're planning to go on a diet. Put large VHF elements on one, and small UHF elements on the other. If you only have the target signals in the UHF band, the VHF sections may be omitted.
|
Ok, this is just my curiosity. Who is building antennas our of pant-stretchers?
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Piggie For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2009, 12:16 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piggie
The length of the element is inversely proportional to the frequency. The higher the frequency the shorter the antenna elements, having no correlation to power. VHF has the best reception on larger elements because it's wavelength is longer, taking a longer element for resonant reception, not because they are weaker.
|
The best way to visualize this is by looking at a traditional, full pipe organ in a church. The pipes producing the lowest bass notes -- the ones that seemingly make the whole place vibrate -- are several inches in diameter and many feet long; several octaves higher, at the top of the scale, the pipes are just a few millimeters across and mere inches in length. The same principle holds true for antennas: A dipole tuned to receive channel 2 is about 8 feet long; at channel 52, the correct length is less than 8 inches. That's why indoor antennas have two whip elements for VHF and a single loop for UHF.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Don_M For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2009, 12:59 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
|
As an interesting aside Don, I was watching a TV game show a month or more ago.
The question was if a trombone extends the slide does the note go higher or lower?
They got it wrong 
|
|
|
07-05-2009, 01:41 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
|
Speaking of game shows, there was one on nickelodeon once called 'Get The Picture' which i thought this was funny:
"Name the Actor who played Steve Urkel on Family Matters"
**Silence**
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
| |
|
|
|
» Recent Topics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Marketplace: Auctions Ending Soon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Google Links |
|
|
|