Quote:
Originally Posted by Piggie
This is the facade the US lives in now. That economics is political. Well it is if you consider both parties are totally controlled by the same corporations and people.
The Chinamerica economic coalition is not sustainable. The vendor can't keep lending the customer money to buy more of the vendors goods even if the vendor devalues their dollars to keep the game going as long as possible. China's economy is recovery faster than ours. Ours is still headed toward a second worse recession in the next year or two.
So heck yeah, I am prejudice to anything we can still buy from the west (not just the US).
The facade is both sides are playing the music the masses want to hear while giving the action to a select few that fund the system.
Anyone that believes listening to Glen Beck or Barack Obama will lead them down a rosy path needs to look at the facts. Neither of them are interested in a better American for those that make under 100 million a year.
By the time the music really stops playing it's going to be way too late, regardless which side of the politic side show you think is correct.
|
I learned my lesson about being political on the AVS forum, and that is why I started posting on here. I am not interested in political arguments, and to disregard the Clear Stream antennas just because you do not agree with their production methods that a vast majority of American Companies also employ is not fair to all of the Newbies who come her for help from the "Experts".
I don't agree with the direction this country is headed in myself, as I work for a living, and I do not approve of the "Spread the Wealth, even if you did not earn it" attitude of the current administration. I view myself as "Conservative" too, but this forum can benefit from the well designed Clear Stream antennas that I have personally proven to myself without a doubt that they work in very difficult reception areas, and they have been the difference between no reception and great reception for quite a few viewers in my area.
In case you did not know, the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) actually endorses the Clear Stream antennas themselves and helped fund their development. I am not aware of all of the details, but the NAB is the voice of virtually all American TV broadcasters in this country with the
FCC and Congress. When the NAB speaks, Broadcasters and politicians alike listen to what they have to say.
They are only interested in supporting Broadcasters and saving
OTA broadcasting from emerging and threatening technologies that want to take the
DTV spectrum for themselves, since
OTA broadcasters "Do not have to pay for their spectrum" like Cell phone and broad banders do. On the other hand, they pay a small pittance for a limited public resource for obscene private profits, so who is actually the bad guy here since they provide no "Public Service" except for 911 emergency capability, but they did not do that on their own, they were forced to do so by the FED.
Once the
DTV spectrum is given away to other technologies for private profit, what happens to those who cannot afford Broadband service, or in some cases cannot even afford a computer. Do we make second class citizens out of them because of their financial condition. and leave them behind when an emergency arises such a 9,11,2001? Leave the politics for the political blogs, of which there must be thousands of on the internet right now, and I am sure you can find one that parallels your political view points with ease.
The Clear Stream Antennas are innovative, and can they help people solve reception problems in many cases which I have proven to myself beyond a shadow of a doubt. END OF MY POLITICAL OPINIONS ON THIS FORUM !!
Linear Mode
