Menu
Home
News
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Forums
Television - Tech, General, and Q&A
DTV | HDTV Reception and Antenna Discussion
Antennaweb vs. TV Fool
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="Fringe Reception, post: 42097, member: 4739"]<strong>TV FOOL gets my vote</strong></p><p></p><p>TV Fool has been a very helpful tool for me to use to determine what antenna and height to try <em>first</em> on customer's sites. I use it and the antenna field maps that used to be available at the REC website. <a href="http://recdev.akane.recnet.com/cdbs/fmq.php?facid=&call=KVOS&ccode=1&latd=&lond=&city=&state=&country=US&zip=&party=&party_type=LICEN&jaws=0">REC Broadcast Query</a> I wish they were still available. My Avatar is the pattern from KVOS-12 (35) Bellingham, WA and I live just south of the red ring. To receive them I built a 15-bar Yagi with coaxial balun and have their signal at a solid 65. By the way, I tried it first with a 'Rat-Shack' balun and the signal was a solid 55, so there is a difference... </p><p></p><p>Regarding the two <em>local</em> antenna 'farms' to my East-ish, TV FOOL is dreadfully inaccurate here do to my hilly and shadowed location, but it is very accurate on distant stations. As far as range, I can receive 47 (a low-power translator) to the south-ish, 50 to the SE and the analog carrier from 10 to the NW in Canada, and that was on my 35 Yagi. Next summer I'll try for that station with a more appropriate antenna. Attached is my TV FOOL chart. </p><p></p><p>Jim</p><p></p><p>PS I have no clue why the attachment shrank itself. I sent it as a .png and now it's a .jpg ... hmmm. Here's the direct link to my location. <a href="http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29&q=id%3d7d521af9588973">http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29&q=id=7d521af9588973</a></p><p></p><p>PPS I checked this morning and the maps are again available at the REC broadcast query website![/QUOTE]</p><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fringe Reception, post: 42097, member: 4739"][b]TV FOOL gets my vote[/b] TV Fool has been a very helpful tool for me to use to determine what antenna and height to try [I]first[/I] on customer's sites. I use it and the antenna field maps that used to be available at the REC website. [url=http://recdev.akane.recnet.com/cdbs/fmq.php?facid=&call=KVOS&ccode=1&latd=&lond=&city=&state=&country=US&zip=&party=&party_type=LICEN&jaws=0]REC Broadcast Query[/url] I wish they were still available. My Avatar is the pattern from KVOS-12 (35) Bellingham, WA and I live just south of the red ring. To receive them I built a 15-bar Yagi with coaxial balun and have their signal at a solid 65. By the way, I tried it first with a 'Rat-Shack' balun and the signal was a solid 55, so there is a difference... Regarding the two [I]local[/I] antenna 'farms' to my East-ish, TV FOOL is dreadfully inaccurate here do to my hilly and shadowed location, but it is very accurate on distant stations. As far as range, I can receive 47 (a low-power translator) to the south-ish, 50 to the SE and the analog carrier from 10 to the NW in Canada, and that was on my 35 Yagi. Next summer I'll try for that station with a more appropriate antenna. Attached is my TV FOOL chart. Jim PS I have no clue why the attachment shrank itself. I sent it as a .png and now it's a .jpg ... hmmm. Here's the direct link to my location. [url]http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29&q=id%3d7d521af9588973[/url] PPS I checked this morning and the maps are again available at the REC broadcast query website![/QUOTE]
Preview
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Television - Tech, General, and Q&A
DTV | HDTV Reception and Antenna Discussion
Antennaweb vs. TV Fool
Top