Menu
Home
News
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Forums
Advanced Discussion
Antenna R&D
Excellent link with antenna comparisons with spectrum analyzer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="EscapeVelocity, post: 48815, member: 3771"]T.Ballister, I was reading some expanded information down at the bottom of <a href="http://www.antennahacks.com/Comparisons/CM4228_vs_DB8_vs_HD8800.htm">this page</a> at AntennaHacks.com that seems to be new.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Youve missed a couple of things. </p><p></p><p>First off, the diameter of the whiskers on the DB8 which increase end lengthening effects, and also the smaller width elements of the Winegard...which has the effect of decreasing the bandwidth of the design (meaning that swr and impedence rise at some points higher and lower to the resonant frequency closer to that resonance frequency.[/QUOTE]</p><p></p>
[QUOTE="EscapeVelocity, post: 48815, member: 3771"]T.Ballister, I was reading some expanded information down at the bottom of [URL="http://www.antennahacks.com/Comparisons/CM4228_vs_DB8_vs_HD8800.htm"]this page[/URL] at AntennaHacks.com that seems to be new. Youve missed a couple of things. First off, the diameter of the whiskers on the DB8 which increase end lengthening effects, and also the smaller width elements of the Winegard...which has the effect of decreasing the bandwidth of the design (meaning that swr and impedence rise at some points higher and lower to the resonant frequency closer to that resonance frequency.[/QUOTE]
Preview
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Advanced Discussion
Antenna R&D
Excellent link with antenna comparisons with spectrum analyzer
Top
