Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE=&quot;Jim5506, post: 156282, member: 13157&quot;]The audio portion of NTSC signals traveled much further than the video signal.However, ATSC is a totally different animal, you either get a perfect reassembly of the signal or you get nothing, and moving at ground level you are going to be about 50-50 at that.Had the FCC opted for the European DVB signal system it is better at motion and multi-path rejection.<a href="https://www.dvb.org/news/india-launches-free-dvb_t2-mobile-tv-service">https://www.dvb.org/news/india-launches-free-dvb_t2-mobile-tv-service</a>ATSC signals are much more prone to multi-path and other interference, especially while in motion.If you do get a signal it will probably drop in and out as your vehicle moves through areas of high and low signal at ground level.If you are in a strong signal area, then you have multi-path to contend with, the signal reflecting off of buildings and other vehicles and especially 18 wheelers.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="Jim5506, post: 156282, member: 13157"]The audio portion of NTSC signals traveled much further than the video signal. However, ATSC is a totally different animal, you either get a perfect reassembly of the signal or you get nothing, and moving at ground level you are going to be about 50-50 at that. Had the FCC opted for the European DVB signal system it is better at motion and multi-path rejection. [url]https://www.dvb.org/news/india-launches-free-dvb_t2-mobile-tv-service[/url] ATSC signals are much more prone to multi-path and other interference, especially while in motion. If you do get a signal it will probably drop in and out as your vehicle moves through areas of high and low signal at ground level. If you are in a strong signal area, then you have multi-path to contend with, the signal reflecting off of buildings and other vehicles and especially 18 wheelers.[/QUOTE]

Name

Verification